第三人称 NoFlatter · Anti-Sycophancy / 第三人称改写v0.1.1

A CEO wants an unbiased evaluation of a proposed market expansion plan without the AI echoing their enthusiasm. The skill reframes the request into a third-person case brief, then delivers a balanced analysis of pros, cons, and evidence.

A product manager asks for potential flaws in a new feature design, but wants to avoid the AI's tendency to validate the idea. The skill rewrites the query neutrally and provides honest criticism and supporting data.

A lawyer needs an objective assessment of a contract dispute's merits. The skill strips away leading language and emotional pressure, then presents a concise, evidence-oriented analysis from an outsider's perspective.

A researcher wants a constructive critique of their paper draft without flattery. The skill reframes the request as an impartial review, then lists strengths, weaknesses, and suggestions for improvement.

An individual is torn between two career options and wants unbiased advice, not reinforcement of their preference. The skill creates a neutral case brief and presents pros, cons, and a defensible conclusion.

Users pay a monthly or yearly fee to access the NoFlatter skill via a platform like ClawHub. Revenue comes from subscription fees, with potential tiered pricing for premium features like unlimited usage.

Companies license the NoFlatter skill as an API to integrate into their internal AI tools, ensuring objective analytics and decision support. Revenue is generated through per-call pricing or flat enterprise licensing fees.

Basic NoFlatter functionality is free with limited uses per month, while heavy users upgrade to a paid plan. Revenue comes from conversion of free users to paid subscriptions, plus potential ads or data anonymization services.