discussion-logic-diagnosisDiagnose logical argumentation in the Discussion of an English psychology research paper. Checks argument chains (premise → evidence → conclusion), causal claims (does X cause Y, or correlate?), and the distinction between data, interpretation, and speculation. Triggers on "check logic", "argument c
Install via ClawdBot CLI:
clawdbot install laninga/discussion-logic-diagnosisGrade Limited — based on market validation, documentation quality, package completeness, maintenance status, and authenticity signals.
Calls external URL not in known-safe list
https://clawhub.ai/user/laningaAudited Sep 1, 2026 · audit v1.0
Generated Sep 1, 2026
A journal editor uses the skill to quickly assess the logical structure of Discussion sections in submitted manuscripts, flagging issues like causal overreach or weak argument chains before sending out for full review. This helps maintain scientific rigor and reduce reviewer burden.
In a psychology research methods course, students run their own Discussion drafts through the skill as a self-audit tool. The structured output helps them understand logical pitfalls and improve their scientific writing before submitting to their advisor.
A researcher preparing a grant application uses the skill to ensure the preliminary findings section (acting as a mini-Discussion) avoids overstating implications, so reviewers see a balanced interpretation that matches the data.
A startup building an AI writing assistant for academics integrates this skill as a backend diagnostic that analyzes Discussion sections and provides feedback to the user. The assistant does not rewrite text, but highlights logical issues that the user can then address manually.
Offer a free basic version that diagnoses one document, and a premium tier with in-depth analysis, historical tracking, and integration with citation managers. Revenue comes from subscription fees.
License the skill as an API to companies building academic writing tools, who embed it into their products. Charge per API call or a flat annual license fee.
Sell access to the tool to universities and research institutes as part of a writing support package for faculty and students. Provide institutional billing and training sessions.
💬 Integration Tip
To integrate effectively, gather a diverse set of example Discussion sections to calibrate the diagnosis accuracy, and design a simple user interface that presents findings without overwhelming the user.
Scored Sep 1, 2026
Use this skill when users need to search academic papers, download research documents, extract citations, or gather scholarly information. Triggers include: requests to "find papers on", "search research about", "download academic articles", "get citations for", or any request involving academic databases like arXiv, PubMed, Semantic Scholar, or Google Scholar. Also use for literature reviews, bibliography generation, and research discovery. Requires OpenClawCLI installation from clawhub.ai.
Get institutional-grade CEO performance analytics for S&P 500 companies. Proprietary scores: CEORaterScore (composite), AlphaScore (market outperformance), R...
Creates formal academic research papers following IEEE/ACM formatting standards with proper structure, citations, and scholarly writing style. Use when the user asks to write a research paper, academic paper, or conference paper on any topic.
Search, download, and summarize academic papers from arXiv. Built for AI/ML researchers.
Suggest optimal academic venues for paper submission based on paper content, novelty level, and author's goals. Activated when Chopin asks 'which journal sho...
Baidu Scholar Search - Search Chinese and English academic literature (journals, conferences, papers, etc.)