discussion-conventions-diagnosisDiagnose academic-writing conventions in the Discussion of an English psychology research paper. Checks the Achievement/Contribution statement (placement, type among 4 — method / results / impact / application), limitations writing, future-work conventions, citation density and function, and the use
Install via ClawdBot CLI:
clawdbot install laninga/discussion-conventions-diagnosisGrade Fair — based on market validation, documentation quality, package completeness, maintenance status, and authenticity signals.
Calls external URL not in known-safe list
https://clawhub.ai/user/laningaAudited Sep 4, 2026 · audit v1.0
Generated Sep 4, 2026
A service that helps non-native English-speaking psychology researchers improve the Discussion sections of their papers by diagnosing compliance with academic conventions, including contribution statements, hedging, and citation density. The skill provides structured feedback without rewriting prose, ensuring academic integrity.
Assists journal reviewers in systematically evaluating the Discussion sections of psychology manuscripts against established conventions. The skill streamlines the review process by identifying common issues such as vague future work, overclaimed contributions, and inappropriate hedging.
Integrates into university courses on scientific writing to provide students with objective diagnostics on their draft Discussions. The skill's structured feedback aligns with course rubrics, helping students self-assess and iterate before submission.
Used by research laboratories to standardize the quality of Discussion sections across publications. The skill ensures consistent adherence to conventions, reducing revision cycles and improving the lab's publication success rate.
Offer a limited number of free diagnostics to attract users, then charge per additional report or monthly subscription for heavy users. The skill automates diagnosis, making per-report costs low.
License the diagnostic engine to editing companies or academic platforms. These businesses embed the skill into their existing tools to add value for their clients.
Sell site licenses to universities and research institutes. Integrate the skill into their writing centers or course management systems for student and faculty use.
💬 Integration Tip
For integration into an academic context, ensure compatibility with standard markdown editors or writing platforms. Provide clear, actionable diagnostic reports that reference specific sections of the paper to facilitate easy corrections.
Scored Sep 4, 2026
Use this skill when users need to search academic papers, download research documents, extract citations, or gather scholarly information. Triggers include: requests to "find papers on", "search research about", "download academic articles", "get citations for", or any request involving academic databases like arXiv, PubMed, Semantic Scholar, or Google Scholar. Also use for literature reviews, bibliography generation, and research discovery. Requires OpenClawCLI installation from clawhub.ai.
Get institutional-grade CEO performance analytics for S&P 500 companies. Proprietary scores: CEORaterScore (composite), AlphaScore (market outperformance), R...
Creates formal academic research papers following IEEE/ACM formatting standards with proper structure, citations, and scholarly writing style. Use when the user asks to write a research paper, academic paper, or conference paper on any topic.
Search, download, and summarize academic papers from arXiv. Built for AI/ML researchers.
Suggest optimal academic venues for paper submission based on paper content, novelty level, and author's goals. Activated when Chopin asks 'which journal sho...
Baidu Scholar Search - Search Chinese and English academic literature (journals, conferences, papers, etc.)