Axioma Skill Evaluatorv2.2.0

Before publishing a skill to a marketplace, run both Axioma and ISO evaluations to ensure it meets quality standards. Automated checks validate file structure, description quality, and script syntax, while manual scoring assesses 25 criteria for comprehensive feedback.

After receiving evaluation results, fix identified issues such as missing frontmatter, poor description, or hardcoded credentials, then re-evaluate until targets (Axioma ≥70, ISO ≥90% automated, manual ≥80) are met. This iterative process systematically enhances skill quality.

A team lead can run the evaluator on all internal AI agent skills to audit quality. The dual system provides both a fast overview (Axioma) and in-depth analysis (ISO 25010), helping maintain consistent quality across the organization.

For skills handling sensitive data, use the ISO 25010 manual assessment to evaluate security (hardcoded credentials, input validation) and reliability criteria. This helps ensure compliance with internal or external regulations before deployment.

Educate new developers on what constitutes a high-quality skill by showing them evaluation reports. The clear criteria and actionable feedback serve as a training tool, reinforcing best practices in documentation, structure, and security.

Offer basic evaluations (Axioma only) for free, with premium access to full ISO 25010 manual assessment and detailed improvement suggestions. Generate revenue through subscription tiers for professional developers and enterprise teams.

Integrate the evaluator as a mandatory quality gate in a skill marketplace (e.g., ClawHub). Charge listing fees or a percentage of sales for skills that pass evaluation, ensuring high-quality offerings and trust among buyers.

Provide consulting services to organizations that need custom evaluation criteria or integration with CI/CD pipelines. Offer tailored assessment frameworks and training workshops on skill quality.