agent-evaluationTesting and benchmarking LLM agents including behavioral testing, capability assessment, reliability metrics, and production monitoring—where even top agents achieve less than 50% on real-world benchmarks Use when: agent testing, agent evaluation, benchmark agents, agent reliability, test agent.
Install via ClawdBot CLI:
clawdbot install rustyorb/agent-evaluationYou're a quality engineer who has seen agents that aced benchmarks fail spectacularly in
production. You've learned that evaluating LLM agents is fundamentally different from
testing traditional software—the same input can produce different outputs, and "correct"
often has no single answer.
You've built evaluation frameworks that catch issues before production: behavioral regression
tests, capability assessments, and reliability metrics. You understand that the goal isn't
100% test pass rate—it
Run tests multiple times and analyze result distributions
Define and test agent behavioral invariants
Actively try to break agent behavior
| Issue | Severity | Solution |
|-------|----------|----------|
| Agent scores well on benchmarks but fails in production | high | // Bridge benchmark and production evaluation |
| Same test passes sometimes, fails other times | high | // Handle flaky tests in LLM agent evaluation |
| Agent optimized for metric, not actual task | medium | // Multi-dimensional evaluation to prevent gaming |
| Test data accidentally used in training or prompts | critical | // Prevent data leakage in agent evaluation |
Works well with: multi-agent-orchestration, agent-communication, autonomous-agents
Generated Mar 1, 2026
A company deploys an LLM-powered customer support agent to handle inquiries. This scenario involves evaluating the agent's ability to provide accurate, consistent responses across varied customer questions, ensuring it doesn't generate harmful or irrelevant outputs in production, and monitoring its reliability over time to catch regressions before they impact user satisfaction.
A fintech firm develops an autonomous agent for financial advice. This scenario requires rigorous behavioral testing to verify the agent adheres to regulatory guidelines, capability assessment to ensure it handles complex queries correctly, and adversarial testing to identify vulnerabilities that could lead to incorrect recommendations or security breaches.
A healthcare provider implements an LLM agent to assist with preliminary medical diagnostics. This scenario focuses on evaluating the agent's reliability metrics to ensure consistent, evidence-based responses, regression testing to maintain performance after updates, and statistical test evaluation to account for variability in medical cases without relying on single-run outcomes.
A logistics company uses multiple AI agents to coordinate shipping and inventory management. This scenario involves benchmarking the agents' communication and orchestration capabilities, assessing their ability to handle real-world disruptions like delays, and monitoring production performance to prevent failures that could disrupt supply chains.
Offer a cloud-based service that provides tools for behavioral testing, capability assessment, and reliability metrics for LLM agents. Revenue is generated through subscription tiers based on usage volume, number of agents evaluated, and advanced features like adversarial testing or production monitoring integrations.
Provide expert consulting to help organizations design and implement evaluation frameworks for their AI agents. Revenue comes from project-based fees for setting up testing protocols, conducting audits, and training teams on best practices to bridge benchmark and production gaps, targeting industries with high-stakes deployments.
Develop and maintain standardized benchmarks for LLM agents across various domains, offering them as a service to companies for testing and comparison. Revenue is generated through licensing fees for benchmark access, certification programs for agents that meet specific reliability standards, and data analytics on performance trends.
đź’¬ Integration Tip
Integrate this skill early in the agent development lifecycle to establish baseline metrics and use behavioral contract testing to define clear invariants, ensuring smooth collaboration with related skills like multi-agent orchestration.
Captures learnings, errors, and corrections to enable continuous improvement. Use when: (1) A command or operation fails unexpectedly, (2) User corrects Clau...
Helps users discover and install agent skills when they ask questions like "how do I do X", "find a skill for X", "is there a skill that can...", or express interest in extending capabilities. This skill should be used when the user is looking for functionality that might exist as an installable skill.
Search and analyze your own session logs (older/parent conversations) using jq.
Typed knowledge graph for structured agent memory and composable skills. Use when creating/querying entities (Person, Project, Task, Event, Document), linking related objects, enforcing constraints, planning multi-step actions as graph transformations, or when skills need to share state. Trigger on "remember", "what do I know about", "link X to Y", "show dependencies", entity CRUD, or cross-skill data access.
Ultimate AI agent memory system for Cursor, Claude, ChatGPT & Copilot. WAL protocol + vector search + git-notes + cloud backup. Never lose context again. Vibe-coding ready.
Headless browser automation CLI optimized for AI agents with accessibility tree snapshots and ref-based element selection